In the next few years the
monarchy is going to work harder and more ferociously than ever to cement
public support in time for Prince Charles’ succession. The upcoming Royal wedding
will be celebrated with a crazed fanfare like never seen before. Glossy
editorials will commemorate the blue blood’s wedding with even more sickening
adoration than in 2011. Plastic union jacks will be sold by the imperial ton
and gaudy royal crockery will be trolleyed out in suburban bungalows across the
nation. Strange men in union jack suits
will sleep on Windsor’s pavements 3 weeks before the day of the wedding. News
crews will be cookahoop at such a spectacle- capturing their garish fancy dress
devotion rather than advising them on a more suitable place to frequent. A
local hospice perhaps? Giant life size Victoria sponge cakes depicting a
waddling Prince George will continue to be baked by culinary royalists (I’m not
even kidding).
In fact, long discredited
commentators are already lining up to announce their long held “affection” for
the aging Elizabeth; how her privileged and unelected grandchildren show so
much “dignity” in their vast richness. The establishment media will goose step
onwards, presenting the public with a never-ending conveyor belt of complimenting
sycophants. BBC correspondents won’t question whether weddings for billionaire
castle owners should be paid for by the tax payer. They won’t mention that the
queen’s estate has been avoiding paying taxes through offshore accounts in the
Cayman Islands. They won’t question whether palace refurbishments should be paid
for by the tax payer in an age of austerity, rising homelessness and NHS
deficits.
But here’s the rub.
Well informed readers know
better than anyone the monarchy’s sheer absurdity – but above all else they
know the monarchy isn’t fit for purpose. And the very first death blow to the
monarchy was inflicted this week. It didn’t come from anywhere within the UK
and it shouldn’t be underestimated.
On Tuesday the Commonwealth
met in secret to discuss who should succeed the now frail and 91-year old unelected
head of state. Colonial subjects as it were, in the Royal’s back garden so to
speak, deciding upon the end of the Commonwealth, as they know it.
Although the role of head
of the commonwealth is technically not hereditary the thought of a meddling and
unpopular Prince Charles as chieftain of another 53 countries is clearly too
much to bear for some. So, the Queen has
been working in secret to try to ensure that “Prince Charles does succeed her”.
Elizabeth has sent “senior officials around the world to lobby Commonwealth
leaders.” Desperate indeed.
Prince Charles claims on
his website that he is a “proud supporter” of the Commonwealth. What will it mean if democracy and greater
sovereignty continues to edge forward in the Commonwealth? If Charles fails to
succeed? Further title stripping of Royals will likely follow in the years
ahead. This secret meeting might be the first
organised attempt at restitution on the claims of our miserable monarchy.
The last few years have
seen unimaginable political change not least in the form of Trump, the fracture
of Syria and in the rise of viable left-wing alternatives in the West. Could we
have envisioned change like this just several years ago? A recent poll found that 63% of Australians now
don’t want Charles to replace the Queen as their head of state. An Australian
referendum on the matter has been proposed for 2022.
The Commonwealth, which
represents 2.4 billion people on earth, can do better than a having a head of
state who has been appointed only by virtue of his ‘noble’ birth.